Correction: Experiences and perspectives on the return of secondary findings among genetic epidemiologists
2019
In the original published version of Table 2 the number of respondents who said “No” to the question “Does your consent form distinguish between targeted and incidental findings?” was indicated as “4.” It should have read “44.” This has now been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.
Keywords:
- Correction
- Source
- Cite
- Save
- Machine Reading By IdeaReader
0
References
0
Citations
NaN
KQI