Endobronchial Treatment of Bronchial Carcinoid in the Elderly

Although surgical resection is considered the gold standard of curative treatment for bronchial carcinoid, endobronchial treatment (EBT) can serve as a less invasive curative or palliative treatment in a selection of patients. It is unclear whether elderly patients with bronchial carcinoid should be treated in the same way as younger patients. In order to study the characteristics and treatment of elderly patients with bronchial carcinoid, we analyzed data from a cohort of patients that have been treated for bronchial carcinoid with EBT, surgical resection, or a combination of both. We used our existing database of patients referred for EBT and defined two groups of patients: ≥ 65 and < 65 years. We compared the characteristics, treatment, and causes of death between these groups. Successful EBT was defined as definitive treatment without signs of recurrence during follow-up with CT and bronchoscopy. Thirty-five patients (19%) were ≥ 65 years. The incidence of atypical carcinoid was the same in both age groups (31%). Thirty-six of 184 patients (20%) were directly referred for surgical resection and 148 (80%) underwent EBT. There was no significant difference in success of EBT between patients <65 years (58/122, 48%) and patients ≥ 65 years (15/26, 58%) (p = 0.347). Complication rates were similar in both groups. After unsuccessful EBT, only 70% (14/20) of the elderly patients was operated, whereas 93% (85/91) of the patients < 65 years was operated (p = 0.001). Disease specific mortality was 6% (2/35) in the group ≥ 65 years and 2% (3/149) in the group < 65 years. The incidence of atypical carcinoid is similar between the elderly and younger patients. Success rate and complication rate of EBT do not differ significantly between the age groups. After unsuccessful EBT, elderly patients were less likely to undergo surgical resection, which does not seem associated with excess disease specific mortality, although the number of events in this study is low.