Field calibration of a cluster of low-cost commercially available sensors for air quality monitoring. Part B: NO, CO and CO2
2017
Abstract In this work the performances of several field calibration methods for low-cost sensors, including linear/multi linear regression and supervised learning techniques, are compared. A cluster of either metal oxide or electrochemical sensors for nitrogen monoxide and carbon monoxide together with miniaturized infra-red carbon dioxide sensors was operated. Calibration was carried out during the two first weeks of evaluation against reference measurements. The accuracy of each regression method was evaluated on a five months field experiment at a semi-rural site using different indicators and techniques: orthogonal regression, target diagram, measurement uncertainty and drifts over time of sensor predictions. In addition to the analyses for ozone and nitrogen oxide already published in Part A [1], this work assessed if carbon monoxide sensors can reach the Data Quality Objective (DQOs) of 25% of uncertainty set in the European Air Quality Directive for indicative methods. As for ozone and nitrogen oxide, it was found for NO, CO and CO 2 that the best agreement between sensors and reference measurements was observed for supervised learning techniques compared to linear and multilinear regression.
Keywords:
- Correction
- Source
- Cite
- Save
- Machine Reading By IdeaReader
29
References
151
Citations
NaN
KQI