Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Contezolid at Therapeutic and Supratherapeutic Doses in Healthy Chinese Subjects, and Assessment of Contezolid Dosing Regimens Based on Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Analysis

Abstract Purpose This study assessed the tolerability and pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of a new-generation oxazolidinone, contezolid (MRX-I), and its major inactive metabolite, M2, after single oral administrations of 800, 1200, and 1600 mg in the fed state, and compared the efficacy of 3 dosing regimens in the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection based on PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) analysis. Methods A Phase I study at a single study center was conducted with 2 parts. In the first part, 20 healthy subjects received a single oral dose of 1200 or 1600 mg of contezolid or placebo in the fed state in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation tolerance study. In the second part of the study, 52 subjects received a single oral dose of 800 mg of contezolid in the fed state in a single-center, randomized, blinded, 4-period, crossover, thorough QT study. Noncompartmental analyses were used to evaluate the PK properties of contezolid and M2. Steady-state concentrations of contezolid following the 3 dosing regimens (800, 1200, and 1600 mg q12h) were simulated by employing a newly developed 2-compartmental PK model. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distributions of contezolid were analyzed in 178 Staphylococcus , Enterococcus, and Streptococcus clinical isolates. Monte Carlo simulations were conducted to predict the efficacy of the 3 dosing regimens to obtain probability of target attainment and cumulative fraction of response. Findings Single-dose oral administrations of 800, 1200, and 1600 mg of contezolid were well tolerated in healthy subjects in the fed state, and nonlinear PK was observed. The mean plasma exposures to M2 exceeded 17.3% of contezolid exposure in the 3 groups. Both MIC 50 and MIC 90 (MICs that inhibit the growth of 50% and 90% of microorganisms, respectively) of contezolid against MRSA were 1 mg/L with clinical isolates from China. PK/PD analysis and Monte Carlo simulations predicted that 800 mg q12h of oral contezolid would be efficacious against MRSA infection, with a MIC of ≤4 mg/L (probability of target attainment, >90%; cumulative fraction of response, >90%). Implications Contezolid is a well-tolerated treatment option for MRSA infection, including at supratherapeutic doses up to 1600 mg. The regimen of 800 mg q12h could achieve efficacy in treating bacterial infection with MRSA. To our knowledge, this is the first PK study to predict that a dosing regimen of 800 mg q12h of oral contezolid is sufficient for treating MRSA infection, with a MIC of ≤4 mg/L. A Phase III study of this suggested dosing regimen is being conducted. Chinadrugtrials.org.cn identifier: CTR20161074.