language-icon Old Web
English
Sign In

Transfinite Adams representability

2016 
Abstract We consider the following problems in a well generated triangulated category T . Let α be a regular cardinal and T α ⊂ T the full subcategory of α-compact objects. Is every functor H : ( T α ) op → Ab that preserves products of H ≅ T ( − , X ) | T α for some X in T ? Is every natural transformation τ : T ( − , X ) | T α → T ( − , Y ) | T α of the form τ = T ( − , f ) | T α for some f : X → Y in T ? If the answer to both questions is positive we say that T satisfies α-Adams representability. A classical result going back to Brown and Adams shows that the stable homotopy category satisfies ℵ 0 -Adams representability. The case α = ℵ 0 is well understood thanks to the work of Christensen, Keller, and Neeman. In this paper we develop an obstruction theory to decide whether T satisfies α-Adams representability. We derive necessary and sufficient conditions of homological nature, and we compute several examples. In particular, we show that there are rings satisfying α-Adams representability for all α ≥ ℵ 0 and rings which do not satisfy α-Adams representability for any α ≥ ℵ 0 . Moreover, we exhibit rings for which the answer to both questions is no for all ℵ ω > α ≥ ℵ 2 .
    • Correction
    • Source
    • Cite
    • Save
    • Machine Reading By IdeaReader
    50
    References
    4
    Citations
    NaN
    KQI
    []