S25 THE ACCURACY OF REGISTRATION WITH CT-BASED NAVIGATION SYSTEM AND ITS APPLICATION FOR MINIMALLY INVASIVE TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY

Purpose: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) makes faster rehabilitation in many cases, but it was sometimes difficult to performed the precise osteotomy and place the implants correctly due to loss of view or orientation for its small exposure. The computer-assisted navigation TKA system (CAS) was reported to achieve the optimal alignment and placement. However, it had disadvantages of longer operation time and wider exposure to acquire the reference points than these of the conventional method. Now MIS technique needs the accuracy of implant placement, on the other hand, CAS needs less-invasive methods. Among CAS methods, CT-based navigation system would have the potential for MIS because it would be referred to preoperative CT images. This study examined the accuracy of the registration with CT-based navigation system and the possibility of its application for MIS. Material and Methods: CT data were obtained from the femur and tibia of “Sawbone” (synthetic bone, Pacific Research Laboratories, Vashon, WA, USA) with a slice thickness of 1 mm. These data were transferred to Vector Vision Knee 1.5 (BrainLab Inc, Heimstettenm, Germany) and reconstructed to three-dimensional model. Two registrations were performed by a surface-matching algorithm. One is the conventional method as Vector Vision protocol; another is MIS approach which was allowed the limited area around the femoral notch and joint surface of tibia for registration. The accuracy of registration with these two methods was evaluated by Vector Vision Knee. And these registration points of these different methods were measured using a coordinate measuring machine, 3D surface scanner (Mitsutoyo, JAPAN) and were analyzed and calculated the distribution of points. Results and Discussion: There was a high degree of reproducibility of the MIS approach compared with the conventional method in the femur. However, the reference points in the distal tibia were deviated 1.5 cm to medial and thus 2.39 degree in varus would be happened at the proximal tibia in both methods. Now this software should be improving to be more accurate.