Anthropogenic and technogenic factors of operational risk at hazardous industrial objects of fuel-power complex

Technogenic and anthropogenic accidence at hazardous industrial objects (HIO) in the Russian Federation has been considered. The accidence level at HIO, including power plants and network enterprises, is determined by anthropogenic reasons, so-called “human factor”, in 70% of all cases. The analysis of incidents caused by personnel has shown that errors occur most often during accidental situations, launches, holdups, routine switches, and other effects on equipment controls. It has been demonstrated that skills needed to perform type and routine switches can be learned, to certain limits, on real operating equipment, while combating emergency and accidental situations can be learned only with the help of modern training simulators developed based on information technologies. Problems arising during the following processes have been considered: development of mathematical and software support of modern training equipment associated, in one way or another, with adequate power-generating object modeling in accordance with human operator specifics; modeling and/or simulation of the corresponding control and management systems; organization of the education system (functional supply of the instructor, education and methodological resources (EMR)); organization of the program-technical, scalable and adaptable, platform for modeling of the main and secondary functions of the training simulator. It has been concluded that the systemic approach principle on the necessity and sufficiency in the applied methodology allows to reproduce all technological characteristics of the equipment, its topological completeness, as well as to achieve the acceptable counting rate. The initial “rough” models of processes in the equipment are based on the normative techniques and equation coefficients taken from the normative materials as well. Then, the synthesis of “fine” models has been carried out following the global practice in modeling and training simulator building, i.e., verification of “rough” models based on experimental data available to the developer. Finally, the last stage of modeling is adaptation (validation) of “fine” models to the prototype object using experimental data on the power-generating object and tests of these models with operating and maintaining personnel. These stages determine adequacy of the used mathematical model for a particular training simulator and, thus, its compliance with such modern scientific criteria as objectivity and experimental verifiability.