State-of-the-Art Devices Comparison
2018
In this section, we present a non-exhaustive list of the most important Three-dimension (3D) camera sensors, devices and solutions available for the mass market. An overview of the main characteristics is provided in Table 3.1.
Table 3.1
Comparison of the main 3D camera commercially available
Range
Frame
Field of
Device
Technology
(m)
Resolution
rate (fps)
view
PMD CamCube 2.0™
Time-of-Flight
0–13
200 × 200
80
40° × 40°
PMD CamBoard™
Time-of-Flight
0.1–4.0
224 × 171
45
62° × 45°
MESA SR 4000™
Time-of-Flight
0.8–8.0
176 × 144
30
69° × 56°
MESA SR 4500™
Time-of-Flight
0.8–9.0
176 × 144
30
69° × 55°
ASUS Xtion™
Structured-light
0.8–4.0
640 × 480
30
57° × 43°
Occipital™
Structured-light
0.8–4.0
640 × 480
30
57° × 43°
Sense 3D scanner™
Structured-light
0.8–4.0
640 × 480
30
57° × 43°
Kinect V1™
Structured-light
0.8–4.0
640 × 480
30
57° × 43°
Kinect V2™
Time-of-Flight
0.5–4.5
512 × 424
30
70° × 60°
Creative Senz 3D™
Time-of-Flight
0.15–1.0
320 × 240
60
74° × 58°
SoftKinetic DS325™
Time-of-Flight
0.15–1.0
320 × 240
60
74° × 58°
Google Tango™ Phone
Time-of-Flight
−
−
−
−
Google Tango™ Tablet
Structured-light
0.5–4.0
160 × 120
10
−
Orbbec Astra S™
Structured-light
0.4–2.0
640 × 480
30
60° × 49.5°
Intel SR300™
Structured-light
0.2–1.5
640 × 480
90
71.5° × 55°
Intel R200™
Active stereoscopy
0.5–6.0
640 × 480
90
59° × 46°
Intel Euclid™
Active stereoscopy
0.5–6.0
640 × 480
90
59° × 46°
Intel D415™
Active stereoscopy
0.16–10
1280 × 720
90
63.4° × 40.4°
Intel D435™
Active stereoscopy
0.2–4.5
1280 × 720
90
85.2° × 58°
StereoLabs ZED™
Passive stereoscopy
0.5–20
4416 × 1242
100
110°(diag.)
- Correction
- Source
- Cite
- Save
- Machine Reading By IdeaReader
5
References
4
Citations
NaN
KQI