What’s left of the rotating presidency? The future of ‘national’ presidencies
2013
The rotating presidency has been at the core of the European Union’s (EU) institutional design ever since its foundation. Rotation ensured non-hierarchical, decentralized leadership of the Council and avoided the emergence of a single power
centre. The result of a sensitive bargain between small and big states, the rotating
Council presidency was left intact over successive treaty changes. However, when
reform fever took over the European project for most of the last decade, the issue
of the rotating presidency dominated the headlines. The draft constitution and its
reincarnation in the guise of the Lisbon Treaty entailed the most fundamental
changes to the office to date. This chapter analyses the presidency reforms and the
extent to which they have affected its leadership potential. Leadership is defined
here as an ‘asymmetrical relationship of influence in which one actor guides or
directs the behaviour of others towards a certain goal over a certain period of
time’.1 Influence, in turn, is understood pragmatically as the capacity to change an
outcome from what it otherwise would have been in the absence of action.2 In the
context of the agenda-setting power of the presidency, this includes the ability to
initiate new policies, but also to structure and limit policy choices.3
- Correction
- Source
- Cite
- Save
- Machine Reading By IdeaReader
0
References
0
Citations
NaN
KQI