Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of sublingual Nitroglycerin test and low-dose Isoproterenol test in patients with unexplained syncope

Abstract Despite the widespread use of head-up tilt testing as a means for diagnosing vasovagal syncope, standardization of test methodology remains a controversial issue. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic value of head-up tilt testing potentiated with sublingual nitroglycerin with that of head-up tilt testing potentiated with low-dose isoproterenol. For this purpose, 71 patients with unexplained syncope (mean age 43 years) and 30 asymptomatic controls were studied. All underwent the sublingual nitroglycerin and low-dose isoproterenol tests on separate days in a randomized fashion. The protocol of the 2 tests was similar and consisted of 2 phases. Initially, subjects were tilted at 60° for 20 minutes without medication; then, if syncope did not occur, patients and controls received sublingual nitroglycerin (300 μg) or low-dose intravenous isoproterenol (mean infusion rate 1.3 ± 0.5 μg/min) and continued to be tilted at 60° for a further 20 minutes. During the sublingual nitroglycerin test, a positive response (syncope associated with sudden hypotension and bradycardia) occurred in 35 patients (49%), a negative response in 36 (51%), and drug intolerance in none (0%). During the low-dose isoproterenol test, these percentages were 41%, 59%, and 6%, respectively. A concordant response was observed in 53 cases (75%). Among controls, 3 subjects (10%) had a positive response to the sublingual nitroglycerin test and 4 (13%) to the low-dose isoproterenol test. It is concluded that sublingual nitroglycerin and low-dose isoproterenol are equivalent tests for evaluating patients with unexplained syncope. The sublingual nitroglycerin test, however, is simpler, better tolerated, and safer than the low-dose isoproterenol test and, thus, more suitable for routine clinical use.