Fire Regime Has a Greater Impact Than Selective Timber Harvesting on Vegetation in a Sub-Tropical Australian Eucalypt Forest

We compared selectively harvested and unharvested areas located among treatments of annual burning since 1952, triennial burning since 1973 and an area that had received no prescribed burning, but with a single wildfire in 2006 (one fire in 72 years), in a dry sclerophyll eucalypt forest, south-eastern Queensland, Australia. Historic fire regime, rather than low-intensity, selective timber harvesting (17% to 37% live tree basal area removed) had a greater impact on a range of vegetation and soil attributes. Plant taxa composition was influenced more by historic fire regime than recent harvesting; of the 25.5% of the variation in taxa composition explained, fire treatments alone accounted for 96.4% of the explained variation and harvesting alone accounted for just 4.8%. Selective harvesting of timber had a predictable influence associated with removal of tree cover and physical impacts associated with extraction of logs. In harvested areas there were increases (p < 0.05) in bare-ground cover and in coarse woody debris volumes and decreases in understorey vegetation height, particularly where woody understorey was present. However, overall, the combined effects of timber harvesting and fire regime were relatively minor. These sub-tropical dry eucalypt forests appear to be resilient to the impacts of combined, but low-intensity disturbances.