Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

2013 
0002-9149/13/$ http://dx.doi.org/1 tation of a permanent pacemaker (PPM) because of development of atrioventricular block (AVB) or development of a condition with high risk of progression to AVB. There are insufficient data regarding long-term follow-up on pacing dependency. From February 2009 to July 2011, 191 transcatheter aortic valve implantation procedures were performed at the Rabin Medical Center (125 CoreValve and 66 Edwards SAPIEN). Thirty-two patients (16.7%) received a PPM (30 with CoreValve and 2 with Edwards SAPIEN). Data from the pacemaker clinic follow-up was available in 27 patients. After a mean follow-up of 52 weeks (range, 22 to 103), only 8 (29%) of 27 patients were pacing dependent. The indication of PPM in these 8 patients was complete AVB. In conclusion, in our center, the rate of PPM implantation was 16%, which is lower than that reported in the published works. Only 29% of those patients implanted with PPM were pacemaker dependent. Further studies are necessary to define reliable predictors for long-term pacing. 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. (Am J Cardiol 2013;112:1632e1634)
    • Correction
    • Cite
    • Save
    • Machine Reading By IdeaReader
    16
    References
    17
    Citations
    NaN
    KQI
    []