Relating Stocking and Density for Natural Regeneration of Conifers in Northern California

Natural regeneration cannot be effectively evaluated by tree density because of spatial heterogeneity typically observed. A proper interpretation of natural regeneration will consider some evaluation of area stocked. However, stocking estimates for natural regeneration are plot-size-dependent. Stocking at the 1-milacre scale is not generally comparable to that on a 4-milacre scale unless a generalized relation with stand density can be established. A generalized relation was first suggested to hold in a paper by Lynch and Schumacher (1941), but this has not been confirmed in subsequent studies. The Lynch and Schumacher hypothesis of a generalized regeneration density-stocking relation across plot size was tested using observations on 60 stands. Results were consistent with Lynch and Schumacher (1941). With evidence of a well-defined relation for plots ranging from 1 to 10 milacres, it appears possible to approximate, for ponderosa pine and associated species, the natural regeneration stocking percentage for a range of stocking standards based solely on observations of regeneration density. Confidence intervals were derived for a range of stocking standards in English units from 1 to 10 milacre and for metric units from 0.0005 hectares to 0.0040 hectares.