Impact of PET/CT on management of patients with esophageal cancer - results from a PET/CT registry study.

2021 
PURPOSE To investigate the impact of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) on clinical management in patients with esophageal cancer and its link to overall survival (OS) in a real-world setting. METHODS A patient cohort with advanced esophageal cancer undergoing PET/CT was prospectively enrolled in a registry study between 04/2013 and 06/2019. Intended patient management prior and after PET/CT was documented based on standardized questionnaire data. Management changes after PET/CT were recorded including major changes concerning the treatment goal (curative vs. palliative) and minor changes (therapy adjustments). OS was analyzed for subgroups with squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) or adenocarcinomas (AC) and stratified for extent of metastatic disease and treatment goals. RESULTS 257 patients (53 female;65.5 ± 10.0 yr.) were included. After PET/CT, major changes of intended therapy were observed in 34/257 patients (13.2%), from curative to palliative (8.2%), palliative to curative (1.9%) and from "not finally determined" to a curative (1.9%) or palliative (1.2%) concept. Minor changes were found in 62/257 patients (24.1%). Invasive procedures and additional imaging were intended in 70/257 (27.2%) and 94/257 (36.6%) patients before PET/CT and 20/257 (7.8%) and 8/257 (3.1%) patients after PET/CT. Curative therapy concepts based on PET/CT were associated with a longer OS (3.5 yr.[95%CI 3.1-3.8 yr.]) as compared to palliative concepts (0.9 yr.[95%CI 0.6-1.2 yr.];p < 0.0001). Patients with SCC had a worse prognosis (2.4 yr.[95%CI 2.0-2.9 yr.]) as compared to patients with AC (3.2 yr.[95%CI 2.7-3.7 yr.];p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS In patients with advanced esophageal cancer, PET/CT has a significant impact on clinical management by improving the selection of individualized treatment strategies and avoiding additional diagnostic procedures.
    • Correction
    • Source
    • Cite
    • Save
    • Machine Reading By IdeaReader
    32
    References
    0
    Citations
    NaN
    KQI
    []