Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Empagliflozin versus Sitagliptin as Second-Line Therapy for Treatment in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in the United States
2020
Aims About 32% of people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) have cardiovascular disease (CVD), with others at increased risk for CVD. Empagliflozin is recommended as second-line treatment for these patients by the American Diabetes Association. Despite the guidelines, sitagliptin, with no demonstrated CV benefit, is used more frequently as second-line. We estimated the cost-effectiveness of sequential addition of these therapies after metformin in T2D patients with or without CVD from the United States (US) payer perspective. Methods An individual simulation model predicted lifetime diabetes-related complications, using UKPDS-OM2 equations in patients without CVD, and EMPA-REG OUTCOME equations in patients with CVD. Additional US-based sources informed inputs for population characteristics, adverse events, non-CV death, treatment escalation, quality-of-life, and costs. Costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were discounted 3.0% annually. Results The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for second-line empagliflozin versus sitagliptin in the overall T2D population was $6,967/QALY. Empagliflozin led to longer CVD-free survival (0.07 years), and an 11% reduction in CV death in patients with CVD compared with sitagliptin. Empagliflozin resulted in greater benefits with greater costs in patients with versus without baseline CVD, yielding ICERs of $3,589/QALY versus $12,577/QALY, respectively. Results were consistent across a range of deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses, and scenarios. Conclusion Compared with sitagliptin, empagliflozin was cost-effective (at $50,000/QALY US threshold) as a second-line treatment to metformin for T2D patients with or without CVD in the US. Our findings lend additional support for more widespread adoption of guidelines by healthcare decision makers for T2D treatment. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
- Correction
- Source
- Cite
- Save
- Machine Reading By IdeaReader
31
References
1
Citations
NaN
KQI