Identification of Surgical Complications and Deaths: An Assessment of the Traditional Surgical Morbidity and Mortality Conference Compared with the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program

Background Despite advances by surgeons in assessing quality and safety, the traditional surgical morbidity and mortality (MM 24% sample), were 0.9% versus 1.9%, respectively (p = 0.001). Complication rates reported in M&M were 6.4% versus 28.9% ACS-NSQIP (p Conclusions Traditional surgical M&M reporting considerably underreports both in-hospital and postdischarge complications and deaths as compared with ACS-NSQIP. Approximately one of two deaths and three of four complications were not reported in the M&M conference at our institution. A Web-based reporting system based on an ACS-NSQIP platform was created to automate, facilitate, and standardize data on surgical morbidity and mortality.