Feasibility of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair for Non-A2P2 Mitral Regurgitation.

BACKGROUND MitraClip is approved for treatment of both degenerative and functional mitral regurgitation (MR). The landmark trials for this device included only patients with A2P2 location of MR. Initial commercial experience showed A2P2 location was associated with higher technical success as compared with non-A2P2 location. We intended to compare technical success of A2P2 vs non-A2P2 MitraClip procedures in terms of residual MR and transmitral gradient (TMG) in the contemporary setting as the operator experience has increased. A total of 159 patients with complete data were included in the study. A total of 129 patients were in the A2P2 MitraClip group and 30 patients were in the non-A2P2 MitraClip group. Post implantation, there was a significant increase in TMG in both A2P2 and non-A2P2 groups (0.73 ± 1.42 and 0.94 ± 1.85, respectively; both P<.01). However, postimplantation TMG was not different between the 2 groups (3.6 ± 1.9 A2P2 vs 3.7 ± 1.7 non-A2P2; P=.56) and there was no difference in residual MR (P=.40). At 1-month follow-up of 82 patients (64 A2P2 and 18 non-A2P2), the results were similar; TMG (3.7 ± 1.6 A2P2 vs 3.7 ± 2.1 non-A2P2; P=.96) and residual MR (P=.41). Our data showed similar technical success of MitraClip procedures in both types of MR.