Evaluation of monoscopic and stereoscopic displays for visual-spatial tasks in medical contexts

In the medical field, digital images are present in diagnosis, pre-operative planning, minimally invasive surgery, instruction, and training. The use of medical digital imaging has afforded new ways to interact with a patient, such as seeing fine details inside a body. This increased usage also raises many basic research questions on human perception and performance when utilizing these images. The work presented here attempts to answer the question: How would adding the stereopsis depth cue affect relative position tasks in a medical context compared to a monoscopic view? By designing and conducting a study to isolate the benefits between monoscopic 3D and stereoscopic 3D displays in a relative position task, the following hypothesis was tested: stereoscopic 3D displays are beneficial over monoscopic 3D displays for relative position judgment tasks in a medical visualization setting. 44 medical students completed a series of relative position judgments tasks. The results show that stereoscopic condition yielded a higher score than the monoscopic condition with regard to the hypothesis. Controlled visual experiments were used to examine performance on 3D spatial tasks.We examine the effects of stereopsis in medical spatial tasks.Stereopsis significantly effects spatial task performance in specific ranges.Color did not affect the performance of participants.Orientation of the 3D representation influenced the effect of steropsis.