Changing logics in healthcare and their effects on the identity motives and identity work of doctors
2020
Recent literature on hybridity has provided useful insights into how professionals have responded
to changing institutional logics. Our focus in on how shifting logics have shaped senior medical
professionals’ identity motives and identity work in a qualitative study of hospital consultants in
the UK NHS. We found a binary divide between a large category of traditionalist doctors who
reject shifting logics, and a much smaller category of incorporated consultants who broadly accept
shifting logics and advocate change, with little evidence of significant ambivalence or temporary
identity ‘fixes’ associated with liminality. By developing a new inductively-generated framework,
we show how the identity motives and identity work of these two categories of doctors differ
significantly. We explore the underlying causes of these differences, and the implications they hold
for theory and practice in medical professionalism, medical professional leadership and
healthcare reform.
- Correction
- Source
- Cite
- Save
- Machine Reading By IdeaReader
62
References
6
Citations
NaN
KQI