A comparison of thiopentone/isoflurane anaesthesia vs propofol infusion in children having repeat minor haematological procedures

We have performed a randomized, cross over study in 22 children suffering from acute leukaemia, who underwent repeated anaesthesia for bone marrow aspiration and lumbar puncture. For their first anaesthetic, the children (aged 3–10 years old) received, either a thiopentone/isoflurane anaesthetic or intravenous propofol, both supplemented with nitrous oxide. On a second occasion they received the alternative technique. Of those children receiving thiopentone/isoflurane, 32% had significant coughing during anaesthesia, two progressing to laryngospasm requiring 100% oxygen. None of the patients receiving propofol had a respiratory disturbance (P=0.016). 68% of the children preferred the propofol anaesthetic. Only one child in the thiopentone/isoflurane group preferred this technique. Twenty-seven per cent had no preference. There was no significant difference in length of anaesthetic time (P=0.07) or the time taken for recovery (P=0.17) between the two groups. There was a large individual variation in propofol requirements and movement was common during stimulation of patients in this group, though this did not adversely affect the surgical procedure.