Effect of scanner illumination and lens transmittance signatures on OPC accuracy
2009
We quantify the OPC accuracy improvement obtained by including the stepper signatures in the OPC model. The
analysis takes into account the complete cycle of OPC model calibration, OPC execution, and image verification of the
OPCed photomask. We use the Nikon Scanner Signature File (NSSF) version 1.5 for the NSR-S610C immersion
scanner; and an OPC model that accounts for vectorial imaging, the polarization map of the illumination, and the pupil
Jones matrix map of the projection optics. We verify that the OPC model closely agrees with a commercial lithography
simulator. We use a 42 nm half-pitch NAND-flash layout to illustrate our point. Post-OPC CD errors obtained when
excluding information about the stepper signature are 11.9 nm (max) and 2.8 nm (RMS). These values drop to 1.9 nm
(max) and 0.7 nm (RMS) when the NSSF is included in the OPC model. In practice, OPC models are calibrated using
CD measurements taken on printed test patterns, which are affected by the scanner signature. OPC model calibration
indirectly and partially captures the scanner signature; however, including the NSSF directly in the model increases
accuracy. In addition, the number of edge-placement errors (EPE) exceeding 1 nm dropped by an order of magnitude
when the NSSF was directly included in the OPC model, as compared to capturing the same information incompletely
using the model calibration instead.
Keywords:
- Correction
- Source
- Cite
- Save
- Machine Reading By IdeaReader
0
References
0
Citations
NaN
KQI