Artificial Intelligent Logs for Formation Evaluation Using Case Studies in Gulf of Mexico and Trinidad & Tobago

2019 
Borehole-log data acquisition accounts for a significant proportion of exploration, appraisal and field development costs. As part of Shell technical competitive scoping, there is an ambition to increase formation evaluation value of information by leveraging drilling and mudlogging data, which traditionally often used in petrophysical or reservoir modelling workflow. Often data acquisition and formation evaluation for the shallow hole sections (or overburden) are incomplete. Logging-while-drilling (LWD) and/or wireline log data coverage is restricted to mostly GR, RES and mud log information and the quality of the logs varied depending on the vendor companies or year of the acquisition. In addition, reservoir characterization logs typically covered only the final few thousand feet of the wellbore thus preventing a full quantitative petrophysical, geomechanical, geological correlation and geophysical modelling, which caused limited understanding of overburden sections in the drilled locations and geohazards risls assessment. Use of neural networks (NN) to predict logs is a well-known in Petrophysic discipline and has often used technology since more than last 10 years. However, the NN model seldon utilized the drilling and mudlogging data (due to lack of calibration and inconsistency) and up until now the industry usually used to predict a synthetic log or fill gaps in a log. With the collaboration between Shell and Quantico, the project team develops a plug-in based on a novel artificial intelligence (AI) logs workflow using neural-network to generate synthetic/AI logs from offset wells logs data, drilling and mudlogging data. The AI logs workflow is trialled in Shell Trinidad & Tobago and Gulf of Mexicooffshore fields. The results of this study indicate the neural network model provides data comparable to that from conventional logging tools over the study area. When comparing the resulting synthetic logs with measured logs, the range of variance is within the expected variance of repeat runs of a conventional logging tool. Cross plots of synthetic versus measured logs indicate a high density of points centralized about the one-to-one line, indicating a robust model with no systematic biases. The QLog approach provides several potential benefits. These include a common framework for producing DTC, DTS, NEU and RHOB logs in one pass from a standard set of drilling, LWD and survey parameters. Since this framework ties together drilling, formation evaluation and geophysical data, the artificial intelligence enhances and possibly enables other petrophysical/QI/rock property analysis that including seismic inversion, high resolution logs, log QC/editing, real-time LWD, drilling optimization and others.
    • Correction
    • Source
    • Cite
    • Save
    • Machine Reading By IdeaReader
    16
    References
    5
    Citations
    NaN
    KQI
    []