Which implant is better for beginners to learn to treat geriatric intertrochanteric femur fractures: A randomised controlled trial of surgeons, metalwork, and patients

Abstract Background We wondered whether the third-generation gamma nail-3 (GN-3) was better for junior surgeons to learn to treat geriatric intertrochanteric femur fractures ​than proximal femoral nail antirotation-II (PFNA-II). Methods This is a prospective randomised study of 350 patients who underwent GN-3 fixation and PFNA-II carried out by junior orthopaedic trauma surgeons from January 2011 February 2017. We compared nail positioning, complication rates, operative and fluoroscopy time, blood transfused, time to mobilisation, hospital stay, fracture union, mismatch, mortality and postoperative outcomes. The minimum follow-up was 12 months (mean, 27.2 months; range, 12–42 months). Results The recovery rate of the GN-3 group was higher than that of the PFNA-II group significantly. Compared with the PFNA-II group, the GN-3 group was superior in fracture gap, while operative time, fluoroscopy time, blood transfused, time to mobilisation, hospital stay, Harris Hip Score, reoperation, mortality and so on had no significant difference between two groups. There were five cases with cutout through the femoral neck in the GN-3 group, whereas in the PFNA-II group, we only had two cases with significant difference. The area of match in the GN-3 group conformed to that of the femur of Asian population better than that in the PFNA-II group. Conclusions PFNA-II and GN-3 internal fixation are both effective methods for junior orthopaedic trauma surgeons to treat femoral intertrochanteric fracture. But our study reveals better results of the GN-3 group over the PFNA-II group on recovery rate. There is a high rate of cutout in patients treated with the GN-3, especially for those with bone defect or serious osteoporosis.