PCL reconstruction: IN VITRO BIOMECHANICAL COMPARISON OF ‘ISOMETRIC’ VERSUS SINGLE AND DOUBLE-BUNDLED ‘ANATOMIC’ GRAFTS

We compared the ability of three different posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstructions to restore normal anteroposterior laxity to the knee from 0 to 130° of knee flexion. Cadaver knees were tested intact, after PCL rupture or after bone-patellar tendon-bone grafting. Grafts were performed isometrically or with a single bundle representing the anatomical anterior PCL fibre bulk (aPC) or with a double bundle that added the posterior PCL fibre bulk (pPC). The grafts were tensioned to restore normal knee laxity at 60° of flexion, except for the pPC which was tensioned at 130°. The isometric graft led to overconstraint as the knee extended resulting in high graft tension in extension and excess laxity in flexion. The aPC graft matched normal laxity from 0 to 60° of flexion but was lax from 90 to 130° of flexion. Only the double-bundled graft could restore normal knee laxity across the full range of flexion.