The effect of bases noncomplementary to the template on the effectiveness of interaction between primers and avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase

: The comparison of the Km and vmax values for various primers was carried out. The primers were either completely complementary to the poly(A)-template or contained noncomplementary bases in different positions from the 3'-end. An increase of the Km and vmax values for primers containing noncomplementary bases was shown. The affinity of the AMV-revertase complex with poly(A)-template to d(pT)10 was shown to be higher by a factor of 93, 325, 338, 425, 95 and 15 than to d(pT)9(pC), d[(pT)2pC]3pT, d(pT)8pCpT, d(pT)7pC(pT)2, d(pT)4pC(pT)5 and d(pC)3(pT)7, respectively. The vmax values for the above primers were 1.2-1.5-fold higher than for d(pT)10. The decrease of the affinity of noncorrect primers to the enzyme was supposed to serve as a mechanism for mistakes correction when noncomplementary to the template mononucleotide units were added to the primer. More effective discrimination between right and wrong primers takes place if the noncomplementary base is in the second or third position from the 3'-end. The mistake correction is performed by dissociation of a wrong primer from the complexes with the enzyme and template. The data obtained for AMV-revertase are in accord with results for pro- and eukaryotic DNA polymerases and are in favour of a similar mechanism of mistake correction by all enzymes in the case of short primers.