Validity and Reliability of Lower-Limb Pulse-Wave Velocity Assessments Using an Oscillometric Technique

There is a growing interest in the deleterious effects of sedentary behaviour on lower-limb arterial health. To permit further investigation, including in larger epidemiological studies, there is a need to identify lower-limb arterial health assessment tools that are valid and reliable, yet simple to administer. Purpose: This study sought to determine the validity and between-day reliability of femoral-ankle pulse-wave velocity (faPWV) measures obtained using an oscillometric-based device (SphygmocCor XCEL) in supine and seated positions. Doppler ultrasound (US) was used as the criterion. Methods: A total of 47 healthy adults were recruited for validity (n=32) and reliability (n=15) analyses. Validity was determined by measuring faPWV in seated and supine positions using the XCEL and US devices, in a randomised order. Between-day reliability was determined by measuring seated and supine faPWV using the XCEL on 3 different mornings, separated by a maximum of 7 days. Results: The validity criteria (absolute standard error of estimate [aSEE] <1.0 m/s) was met in the supine (aSEE = 0.8 m/s, 95% CI: 0.4-1.0), but not the seated (aSEE = 1.2 m/s, 95 % CI: 1.1, 1.2) position. Intras-class correlation coefficient estimates revealed the XCEL demonstrated good reliability in the supine position (ICC=0.83, 95% CI: 0.65, 0.93), but poor reliability in the seated position (ICC = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.23, 0.63). Conclusions: The oscillometric XCEL device can be used to determine lower-limb PWV with acceptable validity and reliability in the conventionally recommended supine position, but not the seated position.