Comparison of 12-hour and 24-hour oximetry recordings in preterm infants: Comparison of 12-h and 24-h oximetry

AIM: To compare the overnight 12-hour oximetry component of 24-hour oximetry recordings with the complete 24-h recording in terms of cardiorespiratory status data in preterm infants. METHODS: Preterm infants from the Wellington neonatal intensive care unit underwent a 24-h pulse oximetry recording immediately prior to discharge home. Each recording was edited to resemble a 12-h overnight recording and compared to the full 24-h recording. Differences in a range of cardiorespiratory variables were assessed as to whether they were statistically significant and, if so, likely to be clinically significant. RESULTS: The nadirs for heart rate and SpO2 (both P < 0.001), the time spent <80% SpO2 (P = 0.017) and highest heart rate (P < 0.001) were significantly different between the two recordings. Only the heart rate nadir differed by more than 5%, suggesting that this may be of clinical significance (median (interquartile range) 54 (28-69) for 24-h recording vs. 78 (54-96) for 12-h recording). CONCLUSION: The 24-h oximetry reports were clinically similar to 12-h recordings for the majority of variables, and therefore, we suggest that 12-h oximetry studies are sufficient for determining cardiorespiratory status in infants.