Inframammary Fold Approach for Second-stage Operation in Expander-Implant Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Despite expander-based breast reconstruction being used as a reliable reconstruction method, implant removal due to wound dehiscence and infection still occurs in 0.5% to 15% of cases. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of the new inframammary fold (IMF) incision approach with previous incision in second-stage operation of expander-based 2-stage breast reconstruction. METHODS Patients who underwent expander-based 2-stage breast reconstruction between February 2014 and May 2019 were included. After expander inflation, patients undergoing second-stage reconstruction were divided into the previous incision and IMF incision groups and their outcomes were compared. Propensity score matching analysis was performed to compare postoperative 1-year results. RESULTS The previous incision and IMF incision groups comprised 79 and 31 patients, respectively. There were no intergroup differences in general demographics or intraoperative data, except for total inflation volume (426.87 ± 102.63 mL in the previous incision group and 375.48 ± 94.10 mL in the IMF incision group, P = 0.017). Wound dehiscence occurred in 12 and 0 cases in the previous and IMF incision groups, respectively (P = 0.018). Implant removal was performed due to dehiscence in 9 cases (8.18%) and 0 cases (0%) in the previous and IMF incision groups, respectively (P = 0.049). In 1-to-1 propensity score matching analysis, the IMF incision group showed better results at 1-year follow-up (odds ratio: 0, 95% confidence interval: 0-1.09; P = 0.063). CONCLUSIONS The IMF approach is a safe method for replacing the expander with an implant, with lower incidence of wound dehiscence and implant explantation.