Comparison of recombinant and synthetic listeriolysin- O peptide- based indirect ELISA vis-à-vis cultural isolation for detection of listeriosis in caprine and ovine species.

Abstract The present study evaluated the comparative serodiagnostic efficacy of recombinant listeriolysin-O (rLLO) and synthetic LLO- 2 peptide-based indirect ELISA vis-a-vis cultural isolation using samples (n = 1326; blood, sera, vaginal swabs, and rectal swabs) collected from caprines (n = 350) and ovines (n = 50) having reproductive and/or nervous system disorders and/or healthy animals. On screening the test sera by rLLO- based ELISA, the antibodies against LLO (ALLO) were observed in 17.71% of the caprines and 2% of the ovines, respectively, while synthetic LLO-2- based ELISA revealed ALLO in 6.86% of caprines and not in ovines. Moreover, the adsorption of positive test sera with streptolysin-O (SLO) resulted in a significant reduction (7.43%; p   0.05) in the seropositivity. Overall, the seropositivity with LLO-2 synthetic peptide revealed comparatively less cross-reactivity in comparison to rLLO. The cultural isolation yielded five pathogenic L. monocytogenes isolates and three non-pathogenic Listeria spp. from caprine samples; however, Listeria spp. could not be recovered from any of the ovine samples. Further, on comparing seropositivity with the isolation study results, it was found that two out of the five animals from which pathogenic L. monocytogenes isolated were also found seropositive in both the ELISAs even after adsorption with SLO. Interestingly, rLLO- based ELISA detected antibodies against unadsorbed caprine sera even in those samples from which non-pathogenic Listeria spp. were isolated, whereas antibodies were not detected in LLO-2 peptide-based ELISA. In conclusion, it could be inferred that the synthetic LLO-2 peptide serves as a non- cross-reactive, ideal diagnostic antigen in serodiagnosis of capro-ovine listeriosis .