Standard Free Versus Osteoplastic Craniotomy: Assessment of Complication Rates During Intracranial Electroencephalogram Electrode Placement for Seizure Localization

Abstract Objective Patients with medically intractable epilepsy often undergo sequential surgeries and are therefore exposed to an elevated risk for infection resulting in unanticipated returns to the operating room. The goal of our study was to determine if use of an osteoplastic bone flap technique would reduce the infection rate in these patients. Methods A single-institution, retrospective chart review of patients with medically intractable epilepsy for grid placement was performed. Univariate analyses and linear regression were used to assess primary outcomes, including infection and hematomas requiring surgical evacuation. Secondary outcomes included duration of treatment and other, unanticipated surgeries. Results A total of 199 patients were identified, 56 (28%) with osteoplastic flaps. Standard free flaps were associated with an increased rate of infection at the craniotomy site (n=24, 17%, versus 0, 0%, P=0.003), whereas osteoplastic flaps were associated with more returns to operating room for hematoma evacuation (n=5, 9% versus 3.2%, P=0.024). Overall, the rate of return to operating room for unanticipated surgeries was similar, but infectious complications prolonged the duration of treatment (median: 17 days versus 2 days, χ2=13.97, p Conclusions Osteoplastic bone flaps markedly decreased the risk of craniotomy infections compared with free flaps in patients undergoing sequential surgeries. However, this decrease is offset by an increase in intracranial hematoma requiring return to the operating room. Infection appeared to be a more significant complication as it was associated with increased duration of treatment. The osteoplastic technique is especially appealing in those patients likely to undergo multiple surgeries in short succession.