Where should I publish? Heterogeneous, networks-based prediction of paper’s citation success

Abstract Scientific output, as measured in research published annually, has seen a consistent growth for decades now. As more manuscripts are submitted for publication each year, new publishing venues appear – often as increasingly specialised offshoots of existing journals and conferences. This situation presents scholars with a wealth of publishing venues to consider and choose from for their manuscripts. Surprisingly, we find that the most cited papers are not necessarily found in the highest-ranked journals, while the best conferences dominate in this regard. We find it intriguing that popular Computer Science conferences act like a vacuum of attention, centralising all good publications, while journals are carried less by their renown and thus can attract strong manuscripts even at a low rank. But to what extent does a venue imply a paper’s recognition and popularity? We propose a new approach and processing pipeline, in which we project a heterogeneous publication network, learn representations for papers and classify said papers according to their 2-year citation success. This framework provides a groundwork for a venue recommendation system, a tool for improving paper’s scientific recognition through a better choice of a publishing venue.