Pre-implant left ventricular dimension is not associated with worse outcomes after left ventricular assist device implantation

Background Left ventricular dimension has the potential to impact clinical outcomes following implantation of left ventricular assist devices (LVAD). We investigated the effect of pre-implant left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) on outcomes following LVAD implantation. Methods Patients implanted with a continuous-flow LVAD between 2004 and 2018 at a single institution were included. The primary outcome was death while on LVAD support. Secondary outcomes included adverse event rates such as renal failure requiring dialysis, device thrombosis, and right ventricular failure. The LVEDD measurements were dichotomized using restricted cubic splines and threshold regression. Survival was determined using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine risk-adjusted mortality based on LVEDD. Results A total of 344 patients underwent implantation of a continuous flow LVAD during the study period. The optimal cut point for LVEDD was 65 mm, with 126 (36.6%) subjects in the 65 mm group. The LVEDD 0.05). Risk-adjusted survival at 1-year (OR 1.3, 95% CI: 0.6-2.5, P=0.53) was also comparable between the groups. Furthermore, incremental increases in LVEDD when modeled as a continuous variable did not impact overall mortality (OR 0.98, 95% CI: 0.9-1.0, P=0.09). Conclusions Preoperative LVEDD was not associated with rates of major morbidities or mortality following LVAD implantation.