Antigenicity of cryopreserved arterial allografts: Comparison with fresh and glutaraldehyde treated grafts

The use of cryopreserved aortic allografts in cardiovascular surgery is widespread and has resulted in excellent outcomes. However, it is controversial whether cryopreservation suppresses the antigenicity of tissue. We designed experimental models to study whether the cryopreservation process alters antigenicity in comparison with that found in fresh and glutaraldehyde treated tissues. Fresh, cryopreserved, and glutaraldehyde treated thoracic aorta from Brown Norway rats were subcutaneously implanted into Lewis rats. Inflammatory cells infiltrating around the grafts were measured on days 7, 14, 28, and 56 after implantation. The glutaraldehyde treated grafts showed significantly less infiltration than the fresh or cryopreserved grafts (p < 0.005). No significant difference was detected between the fresh and cryopreserved grafts. Another study examined the effect of modifications of the aortic allograft on subsequent allogeneic skin graft antigenicity. Subcutaneous implantation of fresh, cryopreserved, and glutaraldehyde treated aortic grafts from Brown Norway into Lewis rats resulted in subsequent skin graft rejection at 4.4 ± 0.7, 5.1 ± 0.8, and 6.6 ± 2.1 days, respectively. There was no significant difference between the fresh and cryopreserved groups; whereas skin grafts in the glutaraldehyde group survived longer than those in the cryopreserved group. These results indicate that cryopreservation had no significant influence on antigenic suppression of arterial allografts.