The development and application of psychophysical methods in upper-extremity work tasks and task elements

Abstract This paper examines an approach to modeling the relationship between perceived acceptable work exposures and physical stressors in upper-extremity tasks using psychophysical methods. Several years of laboratory-based studies and results from a variety of simulated work tasks and task elements are summarized. The original impetus of these studies was founded in the pioneering work and successful application of psychophysical methods applied to manual materials handling tasks (e.g., lifting) generally beginning in the 1960s and 1970s. This approach provided unique and feasible solutions to work design problems involving exposure to the hazard of cumulative trauma. Presently, these methods were adapted to studying common upper-extremity tasks and task elements. Results provide conclusive evidence of the impact of required posture, force, gender and other variables on acceptable task frequency. These results and the psychophysical method in general, may be particularly helpful in establishing realistic and reasonable work design guidelines when workers are exposed to multiple, simultaneous hazards such as force, frequency, with deviated posture, etc, and in the absence of well-defined biomechanical or physiological-based models. Finally, a review of psychophysical theory and methods which can be applied to a wide range of occupational activities is provided. Relevance to industry Psychophysical methods have been utilized for realistic work design guidelines for jobs with risk of musculoskeletal disorders, particularly the low back. This paper summarizes psychophysical methods and results developed for upper-extremity tasks. Required task frequencies should be reduced when postural deviation, required force, and other factors such as vibration, are greater than nominal.