A Prospective Comparative Study of 2 Minimally Invasive Decompression Procedures for Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression (ULBD) Versus Muscle-Preserving Interlaminar Decompression (MILD)

Yoshiyasu Arai,Takashi Hirai,Toshitaka Yoshii,Kenichiro Sakai,Tsuyoshi Kato,Mitsuhiro Enomoto,Renpei Matsumoto,Tsuyoshi Yamada,Shigenori Kawabata,Kenichi Shinomiya,Atsushi Okawa

A Prospective Comparative Study of 2 Minimally Invasive Decompression Procedures for Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression (ULBD) Versus Muscle-Preserving Interlaminar Decompression (MILD)

2014

Yoshiyasu Arai
Takashi Hirai
Toshitaka Yoshii
Kenichiro Sakai
Tsuyoshi Kato
Mitsuhiro Enomoto
Renpei Matsumoto
Tsuyoshi Yamada
Shigenori Kawabata
Kenichi Shinomiya
Atsushi Okawa

Study Design.A prospective comparative study.Objective.To compare prospectively 2 different types of minimally invasive surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSCS): unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD), and muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression (MILD).Summary of Backgr

Keywords:

Decompression
Physical therapy
Surgery
Medicine
Anesthesia
Laminotomy
Lumbar spinal canal stenosis
Back pain
Lumbar
Visual analogue scale
Orthopedic surgery
Low back pain

Correction
Source
Cite
Save
Machine Reading By IdeaReader

References

Citations