Laparoscopic Reoperative Antireflux Surgery Is More Cost-Effective than Open Approach

Background We previously reported on the outcomes of laparoscopic and open reoperative antireflux surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the costs of these procedures. Study Design We performed a retrospective review. Financial and procedure coding data were obtained using a cost accounting system. There were 49 procedures in 46 patients (36 female and 10 male). There were 38 laparoscopic (including 4 conversions) and 11 open procedures (7 transabdominal repairs and 4 gastric-preserving Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy). Values are median and interquartile range (IQR) and mean costs. Results Median age was 54 years (IQR 49 to 67 years) for the laparoscopic group vs 56 years (IQR 50 to 65 years) for the open group (p = 0.675). Mean direct costs per case for the laparoscopic group vs open group were $12,655 vs $24,636 (p Conclusions Laparoscopic reoperative antireflux surgery is more cost-effective than open repair. The laparoscopic approach, when feasible, should be considered the surgical option for treatment of recurrent hiatal hernia in specialized esophageal centers with highly experienced surgical teams.