ANALISIS PUTUSAN HAKIM DALAM PERKARA PRAPERADILAN NOMOR :97/PID.PRAP/2017/PN.JKT.SEL DITINJAU DARI PASAL 77 KITAB UNDANGUNDANGHUKUM ACARA PIDANA

This study purpose to analyze toward the verdict of judge in pretrial, related to the of how the judge to conducting the process of verdict and what the consequences will be appeared, whether the verdict of judge being taken already agree with the criminal-law procedural code (case study of pretrial verdict toward Setya Novanto in verdict number 97/Pid.Prap/2017/PN.Jkt.Sel . The method of this study used is, approach of juridical normative. Where the pretrial verdict that accede Setya Novanto’s adjuration becoming controversial in society but it must be respected as the final verdict already decided by the judge acting for the society representative. Nevertheless, a lesson we can take from this lawsuit is, hopefully KPK and public prosecutor are more carefully and full consideration in handling every case. Therefore, our legal system must be corrected better in the future days, in term of the investigation of the same perpetrators was alleged to be by the Novanto until the case could be verified in front of the judge and the wider community. With the result of the verdict in this case, it is possible to have a bad effect on Indonesian law enforcement, therefore legislators and executives are expected to immediately discuss the plans for changes in KUHAP (Criminal Procedure Code) regarding what can be applied in pretrial cases, wherein the judge is authorized to examine the introduction and examination of the pretrial system.