Cosmogenic 3He exposure ages of basaltic flows from Miller Knoll, Panguitch Lake, Utah: Using the alternative isochron approach to overcome low-gas crushes

2020 
Abstract Determining the ages of young volcanic rocks is important for understanding the tectono-magmatic development of geologic terranes. Usually, if rocks are old enough the 40Ar/39Ar or K–Ar techniques can provide reliable ages. However, when rocks are younger, they often lack enough daughter product to resolve an age. Cosmogenic 3He methods provide an alternative for determining the eruption age of relatively recent mafic/intermediate lava flows. We sampled morphologically young basaltic andesite flows south of Miller Knoll, near Panguitch Lake on the Markagunt Plateau in southern Utah. We took two samples in close proximity from two different areas on the flows and separated both olivine and pyroxene. The typical protocol is to crush mineral separates on-line to determine an inclusion-hosted magmatic 3He/4He component. Then the powders are heated in a furnace to release the total 3He and 4He component and the crushed component is subtracted to determine the cosmogenic 3He component. Unfortunately, in the case of the Miller Lake flows, 3He yield from on-line crushes was below detection. An alternative isochron approach, which obviates the need for crush data, was first described by Cerling and Craig (1994) and more fully by Blard and Pik (2008). In this approach the 3He/4He of the total gas released from furnace heating is plotted vs. 1/4He. If the samples plot on a line, then the resulting y-intercept is the magmatic 3He/4He and the slope of the line is the cosmogenic 3He component, which determines the exposure age. Our data create good isochrons (MSWD = 0.76 and 0.14) with magmatic 3He/4He of 4.7–4.9 Ra. Concentrations of cosmogenic 3He are 2.13 and 2.61 × 107 atoms g−1after correction for radiometric 4He using the R correction factor and measured and estimated U and Th concentrations in whole rock and minerals, respectively. Using the LSDn scaling routine and an online exposure age calculator, we determine zero erosion exposure ages of 32 ± 3 ka for the upper part of the flow and 34 ± 4 ka for the lower part of the flow.
    • Correction
    • Source
    • Cite
    • Save
    • Machine Reading By IdeaReader
    39
    References
    1
    Citations
    NaN
    KQI
    []