Burden of Proof Inverted Exists in China's Criminal Law?——Comment concurrently on burden of proof of possessing kind crimes on the "presumption"

In China's criminal law,the view of Burden of Proof inverted is defective."Burden of Proof" in nature refers to results accountability.Provisions on the two special "Possessing" kind crimes are supposed to be presumption of criminal crime in China's Criminal Law,so that they should be in line with the general principles.Among various theories,a more reasonable one seems to be modified "the responsibility to provide evidence" —— the presumption does not only mean the transfer of responsibility to provide evidence but also the evidence provided must reach advantage to the extent that judges doubts of the fact presumed.The public prosecutor shall be responsible for proving the defendant guilty.It's maybe suitable to understand the burden of proof of possessing kind crimes on "presumption" in the way as "forming disputable points responsibility","forming doubt points responsbility",and "excluding doubt points responsibility",which much more highlight the characteristics of the criminal procedural law and the core of innocence presumption.