The AGREE II Instrument Is Helpful for Creation of National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines

To the Editor: We commend Don-Wauchope et al., who assessed 11 National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry (NACB)1 laboratory medicine practice guidelines (LMPGs) with the AGREE II (Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II) instrument (1), and we thank Bossuyt for his accompanying editorial (2). The results of this study are helpful but are not unexpected. These LMPGs were developed over several years. The 8 nonarchived LMPGs published in the past 5 years used 4 different systems for grading and weighting practice recommendations. One system that several LMPG committees have used is a modified US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) system. A second system used for 2 LMPGs was that of the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association. At times, NACB LMPG committees have used clinical societies' systems when these groups are primary collaborators in LMPG development, as well as significant end users of the LMPG. A third system created by the authors of 3 LMPGs focused on tumor marker tests. This unique system was developed by LMPG members who felt that considerable heterogeneity in clinical oncology practice guidelines failed to indicate a preference in any clinical society's system. Finally, authors of the most recent diabetes …