Electronic cigarettes: One size does not fit all

Electronic cigarettes (ECs) have been growing rapidly in popularity among youth and adults in the United States over the last decade. This increasing prevalence is driven partially by the ability to customize devices, flavors, and nicotine content and the general notion that ECs are harmless, particularly in comparison with conventional cigarettes. In vitro and in vivo murine models have demonstrated a number of harmful biological effects of e-liquids and their aerosols. However, limited clinical data exist on whether these effects translate into detrimental long-term outcomes in human subjects. The short-term harmful respiratory effects of EC use demonstrated in nonsmokers argue against their use. However, slightly more favorable data exist for the respiratory benefits of substituting conventional cigarettes with ECs and the short-term efficacy of ECs as smoking cessation tools. Nonetheless, available research is severely limited in regard to long-term outcomes and by study designs fraught with bias, pointing to the need for additional research efforts with well-designed longitudinal studies to guide US Food and Drug Administration regulatory efforts. The hurdle presented by diverse device designs and e-liquid permutations, which contribute to the inconsistency of available data, also highlights the need for legislative standardization of ECs.