[Accuracy of two thyroid imaging, reporting and data systems for differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules].

OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of two widely used thyroid imaging, reporting and data systems (TI-RADS), namely ACR TI-RADS and Kwak TI-RADS, in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules. METHODS: We reviewed the data of 350 thyroid nodules with definite diagnoses by surgical histopathology (n=144, 41.14%) or fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytopathology (n=206, 58.86%). The nodules were graded using ACR TI-RADS and Kwak TI-RADS based on the ultrasound images, and the diagnostic accuracy of these two systems was evaluated by the area under the receiveroperating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: The AUCs of ACR TI-RADS and Kwak TI-RADS were both 0.879. For a differential diagnosis of the thyroid nodules, ACR TI-RADS had a diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, Youden's index and accuracy of 77.3%, 89.1%, 83.0%, 85.1%, 7.101, 0.255, 27.848, 0.664 and 0.843, respectively, with an optimal threshold of TR5, as compared with 84.8%, 84.0%, 78.3%, 89.0%, 5.283, 0.181, 29.265, 0.688 and 0.843, respectively, of Kwak TI-RADS, which had an optimal threshold of 4c. CONCLUSIONS: Both ACR TI-RADS and Kwak TI-RADS have good performance for differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules, but ACR TI-RADS has a higher specificity and a lower sensitivity compared with Kwak TI-RADS.