[Computerized tomography in the study of thoracic-pulmonary complications after liver transplantation].

PURPOSE: To review the role of Computed Tomography (CT) in thoracic complications following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a post-OLT population of 567 patients transplanted in our institution, 100 patients (17.6%) were examined with chest CT. We reviewed data relative to the total number of examinations, clinical and/or radiographic indications, the CT technique--i.e., conventional (with(out) intravenous, i.v., contrast material) or high-resolution (HRCT). We also reviewed the radiologic patterns and their correlation with the other clinical, bronchoscopic and/or laboratory results. RESULTS: Of 152 chest CT examinations, 45 (29.6%) were performed because of clinical indications, 31 (20.4%) because of a radiographic abnormality, 64 (42.1%) because of clinical and radiographic indications, while in 12 cases (7.9%) the reasons were unknown; 133/152 (87.5%) examinations had been performed with conventional CT scanning (100 with i.v. contrast agent and 33 without) and 19/152 (12.5%) with HRCT. Twenty of 152 (13.2%) examinations, in 16 patients, were normal; in the other 84 patients, 132/152 (86.8%) CT/HRCT studies showed 247 pathological findings (99 pleural effusions, 3 pericardial effusions, 62 cases of atelectasis, 1 pulmonary calcification, 70 suspected inflammatory parenchymal consolidations, 64 of them alveolar and 6 interstitial, 4 cases of interstitial edema and finally 8 neoplastic infiltrates). DISCUSSION: Correlated with clinical data, CT findings are very useful in detailing clinical-radiographic screening findings, despite the limitations in typifying pleural effusions, in differentiating atelectases from inflammatory parenchymal consolidations and in assessing pneumonia etiology. Also, despite its high sensitivity (94.1%) and specificity (92.8%), CT was not accurate enough in the differential diagnosis of pneumonia. History data were necessary to characterize the histology of neoplastic infiltrates. CONCLUSIONS: Chest CT has relatively uncommon, and sometimes only clinical, indications in post-OLT patients. The technique is chosen based on clinical-radiographic findings. CT proved useful in showing negative cases and in detailing clinical and radiographic findings but must be integrated with clinical findings to define inflammatory and neoplastic conditions.