Risk factor analysis for adverse events and stent dysfunction of Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided choledochoduodenostomy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Although the technique of endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) is becoming standardized, its safety issues have not been sufficiently investigated. Therefore, we aimed to identify factors associated with adverse events and stent patency in EUS-CDS. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent EUS-CDS between September 2003 and July 2017 were included. Technical/clinical success, adverse events and stent dysfunctions were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: A total of 151 patients underwent EUS-CDS. In nine patients, procedures were discontinued before puncture. Technical and clinical success rates were 96.5% (137/142) and 98.5% (135/137), respectively. The adverse event rate was 20.4% (29/142). As a risk factor for peritonitis, plastic stents (PS) showed a significantly high odds ratio (OR) compared with covered self-expandable metal stents (CSEMS) (OR,4.31; P=0.030). CSEMS cases showed a significantly longer patency period than PS cases (329 vs 89 days; HR,0.35; P<0.001). As a risk factor for early stent dysfunction (within 14 days), stent direction to the oral side showed a significantly high OR (OR,43.47; P<0.001). In cases with oblique-viewing (OV) EUS, double penetration of the duodenum occurred at significantly higher frequency than in cases with forward-viewing (FV) EUS (7.0 vs 0.0%; P=0.024). CONCLUSIONS: Plastic stents and stent direction to the oral side were risk factors for peritonitis and early stent dysfunction, respectively. Using covered self-expandable metal stents and changing stent direction to the anal side seemed appropriate to prevent peritonitis and early stent dysfunction.