Application of the Patient Engagement Evaluation Tool (PEET): A cross-sectional survey to assess knowledge user engagement in a systematic review on the comparative effectiveness of geriatrician-led models of care

Abstract Background A systematic review (SR) was conducted to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of geriatrician-led models of care, and an integrated knowledge translation (iKT) approach facilitated SR relevance. Activities to engage knowledge users (KUs) in the SR were evaluated for perceived level of engagement. Study Design and Setting KUs included patients, caregivers, geriatricians, and policymakers from three Canadian provinces. Activities included 1) modified Delphi to select outcomes; 2) cross-sectional survey to select outcome measures, and 3) in-person meeting to discuss SR findings. KU engagement was assessed using the Patient Engagement Evaluation Tool (PEET) after the second and third activities. KUs rated the extent of successful engagement using a 7-point Likert scale ranging from “no extent” to “very large extent.” Results In total, 15 KUs completed the PEET: eight geriatricians, four policymakers, two patients, and one caregiver. Median engagement scores across all activities (median range: 6.00-6.50) indicated that KUs felt engaged. Differences were observed for activity type; perceived engagement at in-person meeting resulted in higher meta-criteria scores for trust ( P  = 0.005), legitimacy ( P  = 0.003), fairness ( P  = 0.013), and competency ( P  = 0.035) compared with online activities. Conclusions KUs can be engaged meaningfully in SR processes. Their perceived engagement was higher for in-person than for online activities.