One- versus two-surgeon active stone retrieval procedures for flexible ureteroscopy: An off-site simulator comparative study.

OBJECTIVES To evaluate the efficacy of the one-surgeon basketing technique compared to the conventional two-surgeon method for flexible ureteroscopy. METHODS Seven urologists (three trained and four less-trained surgeons) extracted three renal stones using each technique with an off-site simulator. We analyzed the task completion time, the number of times the basket forceps were opened and closed, and unexpected events during stone-catching, for both techniques. RESULTS There was no significant difference in the total task completion time between the one-surgeon (102.0 [interquartile range 63.5-164.0] s) and two-surgeon (99.5 [interquartile range 75.0-145.3] s) techniques. However, the time it took the trained surgeons to extract all stones was significantly shorter with the one-surgeon than with the two-surgeon technique (19.0 [interquartile range 18.0-20.0] s vs 34.0 [interquartile range 25.0-40.0] s; P = 0.049). Among the less-trained surgeons, the opposite effect was observed, but this difference was not statistically significant (96.5 [interquartile range 61.0-134.5] s vs 64.0 [interquartile range 51.5-77.0] s; P = 0.489). The number of times the forceps were opened and closed during stone-catching was significantly lower with the one-surgeon technique than with the two-surgeon technique (5.0 [interquartile range 4.0-5.0] times vs 9.0 [interquartile range 6.0-14.5] times; P = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS The one-surgeon technique can offer comparable efficacy to the two-surgeon technique. If surgeons are sufficiently trained, a one-surgeon basketing technique for performing flexible ureteroscopy might become a new technical modality for extracting renal stones.