Is the depth correction using the geometric mean really necessary in a 99Tcm-DMSA scan in the paediatric population?

Determination of the left to right dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) uptake ratio is theoretically one of the easiest quantitative procedures in nuclear medicine. The quantification can be performed on the posterior view, with or without the lateral view for correction of kidney depth. The geometric mean can also be determined using both the anterior and the posterior views. The aim of this study was to evaluate the occurrence of remarkable differences in the results from quantification of the relative renal function using the geometric mean and those obtained using the posterior counts only. Moreover, we evaluated to what extent the patient age influenced these differences. We reviewed 328 99 Tc m -DMSA scans. The difference between the relative renal function obtained using the posterior view and that obtained using the geometric mean was calculated and analysed statistically. For the purpose of evaluating the value of performing the geometric mean calculation in patients of different ages, patients were divided into four age groups (group I, ≤2 years; group II, 3-9 years; group III, 10-18 years; group IV, >18 years). Using the Student's t test, no statistical differences were found in the relative renal function obtained by the two methods (posterior projection end geometric mean) in groups I (t=0.01, P=0.992) and II (t=1.43, P=0.155), which consisted of patients younger than 10 years (77% of the patients). In groups III and IV statistical differences were found (t = 2.27, P = 0.028 and t = 2.170, P = 0.038), respectively. We conclude that for children under 10 years it is unnecessary to perform depth correction using the geometric mean except in rare cases of major malformations and position anomalies.