Accessibility of an ultrasonic furcation tip to furcation areas of mandibular first and second molars.

: The purpose of this study was to compare an ultrasonic furcation tip with an ultrasonic conventional tip and a hand scaler on accessibility to furcation areas of mandibular first and second molars. The study was conducted on 360 artificial molars that were replicated from 30 mandibular first molars and 30 second molars with silicone impression material and resin. The furcation areas of each molar were coated with red nail colour for artificial calculus. The root areas from the cement-enamel junction apically were covered with silicone rubber simulating gingival tissue. Then the models were instrumented on the buccal or lingual aspects by an experienced operator with each of the following instruments: an ultrasonic furcation tip, an ultrasonic conventional tip and a hand scaler. After instrumentation the percentage of the furcation area with residual artificial calculus was assessed using a computerised imaging system. Results showed that when the horizontal pocket depth was less than 2mm, all three instruments showed good accessibility. When the horizontal pocket depth was more than 2mm, the ultrasonic conventional tip and the hand scaler showed less removal of artificial calculus than the ultrasonic furcation tip (P < 0.01). Efficiency of the ultrasonic furcation tip was fairly satisfactory for the horizontal pocket up to the ridge of the furcation roof.