Implementing Cooperative Structures To Increase Motivation and Learning in the College Classroom.

1995 
In a unique class of combined elementary and secondary teacher education majors, this triangulated qualitative study investigated how cooperative structures affect student attitudes and motivation. In particular, the study examined students' preferences for instruction, students' attitudes and motivation related to their preference for cooperative structures, and students' perceptions of their own learning. Students were instructed in a lecture or lecture-discussion group using an incremental approach implementing t" Jigsaw, Focused Discussion, Turn-to-Your-Partner, and TGT (Team, names, Tournaments) cooperative structures. Five weeks of typical course content with cooperative groups was provided. Then students received an overview of cooperative learning history, theory, and characteristics of effective use. Providing experience with cooperative activities before introducing cooperative learning as a topic for study led to more positive attitudes. However, responses on attitude and motivation subscales of the "Learning Preference Scale: Students" (LPSS) and the "Learning and Study Strategies Inventory" (LASSI) indicated that students in the study had an above average attitude score and a below average motivation score. These findings were discussed with students in ethnographic interviews on student perceptions of college-level instruction and attitude and motivation toward learning. The study concluded that cooperative learning structures generally yielded positive outcomes for students. A final conclusion was that the students' interest in the material, use of language in learning the material, and active pursuit of learning was enhanced by structured cooperative groups. The appendix describes the cooperative structures used and how to implement them. (Contains 2 tables, 3 figures and 53 references.) (JB) IMPLEMENTING COOPERATIVE STRUCTURES TO INCREASE MOTIVATION AND LEARNING IN THE COLLEGE CLASSROOM
    • Correction
    • Source
    • Cite
    • Save
    • Machine Reading By IdeaReader
    25
    References
    11
    Citations
    NaN
    KQI
    []