On the fate of 220Rn in soil material in dependence of water content: Implications from field and laboratory experiments

Abstract To study the potential of 220 Rn as a groundwater tracer, we analyzed different groundwater systems with a laboratory-proven radon-in-water detection system. However, with one single exception, no 220 Rn was detected in the groundwater, although 222 Rn was always present at high concentrations. Field observations of 220 Rn and 222 Rn in soil gas revealed soil water content to be the crucial control for 220 Rn release from soil grains to soil pores. We identified water films around and water menisci between the soil grains to impede the diffusive transport of 220 Rn. This finding was confirmed by the results of laboratory experiments with monazite pebbles and manganese sand, which both are 220 Rn sources. Besides the water content, the laboratory experiments also identified the water flow (turbulent in the experiment versus laminar in groundwater) to control the 220 Rn emanation. The laminar flow condition in groundwater, together with the soil water content, set a conceptual frame to explain why 220 Rn can be detected in unsaturated soil but not in groundwater.